Friday 03 September 2010 Government 2.0: The Road Ahead
UN Human Development Index fails India at 134

The UN report says quality of life in India is appalling but India’s Planning Commission Deputy Chairman MS Ahluwalia raises fingers at its accuracy

New Delhi: India ranked 134 in terms of quality of life out of 182 countries surveyed by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in its annual report on Human Development Index (HDI).

The UNDP report released here on Monday clearly shows the quality of life in India continues to be appalling and the country has slipped in comparative terms in ensuring a better quality of life for its citizens. In the previous index, published for 2007 and 2008 together, India ranked 128, while the position was 126 in 2006, reports IANS.

Normally published annually since 1990, the index goes beyond a nation's gross domestic product (GDP) to measure the general well-being of people under a host of parameters, such as poverty levels, literacy and gender-related issues.

"Overall, however, India has made steady progress on the Human Development Index. Its value has gone up from 0.556 in 2000 to 0.612 in 2007," UNDP Resident Representative in India Patrice Coeur-Bizot said.

This year, the report focuses on migration — "Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development" — to cast a new light on some common misconceptions on the subject and propose a series of policies to increase people's freedom and improve their lives.

Though the report was released in India by Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, he strongly reacted at the accuracy of the report.

"I would suggest the UNDP to also look at how the report is perceived around the world. They should come out with these reactions also," Ahluwalia said.

He further suggested that the report include other parameters for checking internal migration within a country.

"Some of India's data seem to show a small per cent of population as migration. If you compare our internal migration with China it is much lower. It is important to know migration within countries," he added.

In the neighbourhood, China, Sri Lanka and Bhutan rank higher than India at 92, 102 and 132, respectively, while Pakistan at 141, Nepal at 144 and Bangladesh at 146 rank lower, the report said.

Norway continues to top the chart, while Australia, Iceland, Canada, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, France, Switzerland and Japan make up the top 10. The US is ranked 13, while Britain and Germany are further down at 21 and 22.

I dont believe. How India be ranked below Srilanka and Bhutan.There appears to be somethig wrong in accuracy, parameters adopted and analysed.

Accurate or not is a debatable issue. However, there is no denying fact that the things are far from rosy and there is every possibility that we will fall short of attaining Millennium Development Goals in time. Attention towards this is urgently warranted that the debate per se.

It's time the Indian government realised that development has to focus on the happiness and well being of the people and not on how much a nation spent. Today it's the people with power and money who decide what course to take because they have vested interests. Unless the civil society unites and raises its voice, our natural resources, culture and heritage are a gone case.

I am not sure what parameters were used in the survey. But it is difficult to believe that China where migration is strictly controlled by the state should rank above 100. India has other adverse factors though:
1. Foreigners do not find India a conducive place to visit or stay because of hagglers and beggars.
2. There is inadequate planning in urban areas for accommodating migration workers from rural areas, leading to unhygienic slums and crimes.
3. There is an increasing trend to oppose intermingling of people from other states, for example in Maharashtra.
4. There is a huge gap between the urban and rural living standards. India is quite backward in health care.

It is not provocative to consider Norwegians at the forefront of humanity with their ethical stances and support for peace.

I find it hard to belive that India ranks lower than Sri Lanka and Bhutan... what exactly are the parametres that determine "quality of life"? Is it possible to read why and how we are not being able to match up or rather move up in the index?

This report is released every year. It seems that it has become a ritual. Why no corrective measures are seriously discussed by all concerned ministries and action taken.

Post Comments

Total Comments: 6



Leave a Reply
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Enter text displayed below in a given field.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.
 
Todays Main News »

Sign up for your free email iGovernment newsletter